90.9 WBUR - Boston's NPR news station
PLEDGE NOW


























The Roger Coleman Case: Did Virginia Execute an Innocent Man?

A statue of a coal miner stands outside the courthouse where Roger Coleman was tried and convicted. (Photo Courtesy John Tucker)

(UPDATE: DNA tests conducted in January 2006 confirmed the original guilty verdict in this case. Click here for more on this story.)

Law enforcement officials in Virginia are embracing the power of DNA to reveal the truth. But they are resisting one DNA test that could reveal a mistake and shake the public's faith in the criminal justice system. Since 1976, one hundred people have been freed from death row, 12 because of DNA. Opponents of the death penalty say these numbers expose a flawed system that more than likely has executed innocent people. In fact, that's never been proven, but now DNA could answer the question: did the state of Virginia kill an innocent man 10 years ago?

Grundy, Virginia is a remote, small town that sits in a deep ravine in the heart of the Appalachian hills. On most days, the mile-long freight trains, laden with coal dug from the shafts deep beneath the scarred countryside, rumble and rattle through the town. In March of 1981, Grundy's monotony was interrupted by the rape and murder of 19-year-old Wanda McCoy in a small, white house overlooking the bubbling waters of Slate Creek. McCoy was raped, stabbed, and her throat slashed so violently that she was practically decapitated. Police quickly focused on her brother-in-law, Roger Keith Coleman, a white coal miner who'd been jailed once for attempted rape. Coleman was tried, convicted and sentenced to death. For 10 years, along with a network of lawyers and supporters, Coleman insisted he was innocent; but by the spring of 1992 - as the rains swelled the waters of Slate Creek - Coleman's legal remedies were exhausted and he was executed. Jim McCloskey fought for years to save his life, and is still trying to clear his name. "I promised Roger Coleman the night he was executed [that] I would do all within my power to prove that he was innocent," says McCloskey. "Those were my last words to a dying man."

 MORE INFO
"May God Have Mercy" by John Tucker - Read the first three chapters.

McCloskey is a former management consultant who founded Centurion Ministries in Princeton, New Jersey, where he works to get the falsely convicted out of jail and sometimes off of death row. On the walls of his office, framed newspaper pages tell the stories of the 25 men he's helped to free in the last 20 years. Also on the wall, the cover of Time Magazine from May 19th, 1992, the day before Roger Coleman was executed. It shows a picture of Coleman and the caption, "This man might be innocent. This man is due to die."

Roger Coleman in prison, before he was executed. (Photo Courtesy John Tucker)

Ten years on, Jim McCloskey remains convinced Coleman was innocent, and he thinks DNA can prove it. At issue is a small, carefully preserved vial that contains a few drops of fluid from a vaginal swab taken from Wanda McCoy the night she was murdered. The evidence has never been subjected to modern DNA analysis, and McCloskey and several major newspapers have gone to court in Virginia to win the right to test it. "I would hope that we would all want to discover the truth of the matter. What's the argument for this not to be done?" asks McCloskey. Officials in Virginia have argued in court that the case is closed, and that there's nothing to suggest that Roger Coleman was innocent. The state's attorney general, Jerry Kilgore, points out that DNA analysis available at the time didn't rule out Coleman as the murderer. That's true, but neither did it prove his guilt. But Kilgore says the evidence in the Coleman case has been "tested, retested, and re-retested," and it is now long past time to move on. "All the DNA evidence points to Roger Coleman as being the culprit of this terrible crime."

Back in Grundy, a bronze statue of a coal miner, tarnished by the weather, stands in front of the gray-stone courthouse where Roger Coleman was convicted and sentenced. Phillip Van Dyke is an old high school buddy of Coleman's, who believes the pressure to solve the case that terrorized this quiet community 20 years ago led to a rush to judgment. Van Dyke recalls the sign that a member of the town posted right beside the courthouse where Coleman was being tried, which read: "It's time for another hanging in Grundy."

"How," Van Dyke wonders, "do you have a trial inside that court house? It's obvious that people's minds were made up."

Van Dyke was a witness for Coleman's defense who challenged a crucial piece of the prosecution's case. Prosecutors said Wanda McCoy was murdered at about 10:30 in the evening, but Van Dyke says that's just when he stopped to talk to Coleman after Coleman left work several miles from the victim's home. Van Dyke says there was no reason for Coleman to murder his sister-in-law, but even if he wanted to, he could not have done it in the time frame laid out by prosecutors. A witness for the prosecution put Coleman closer to McCoy's house just before the murder, but that still would have left only a few minutes for Coleman to park his truck, wade across Slate Creek, walk a hundred yards up to Wanda McCoy's house and commit the crime. But Tom Scott, who prosecuted the case and still lives in Grundy, says that's all the time Coleman needed. "He certainly didn't go there to make love to this woman," says Scott. "He went there, slit her throat, he stabbed her twice in the chest, he raped her…and quite frankly, I don't think that encounter took more than five or 10 minutes."

Scott built his case with circumstantial evidence. There was testimony from a jailhouse snitch, but no witnesses. Blood and hair tests pointed to Coleman, but they weren't conclusive. Meanwhile, Coleman was represented by two court-appointed attorneys trying their first capital case, who failed to present important evidence to rebut the prosecution's case.

The house where Wanda Fay Thompson was raped and murdered. Above, the house of the neighbor alleged to have admitted to her murder. (Photo Courtesy John Tucker)

And then there were dramatic claims by several people in Grundy, including a young woman named Teresa Horn, who said another man, a neighbor of Wanda McCoy's, admitted to the murder. Horn was reluctant to go public, but years after Coleman was convicted, she finally came forward and made a statement to a local television station. The next day, she died of a drug overdose, and to this day, Jim McCloskey and others in Grundy suspect she was silenced. McCloskey says, before she died and after much prodding, he convinced Horn to give him a sworn affidavit. "She was a scared and shaken women," recalls McCloskey, "because she was afraid that if she did come forward that the real killer would kill her."

McCloskey spent years gathering evidence in support of Coleman's innocence, which never made it into court. That's because lawyers handling Coleman's appeal misread a deadline and filed papers one day late. That clerical error led to a string of legal defeats that went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, which finally ended Coleman's 10-year legal battle for his life.

But McCloskey says Coleman's execution didn't resolve a crucial question: "Did the Commonwealth of Virginia execute an innocent man or a guilty man?"

Roger Coleman with Sharon Paul, with whom he corresponded while in prison. (Photo Courtesy John Tucker)

The answer to McCloskey's question could reside in the vaginal swab, a few drops of which have been stored in the lab of Dr. Edward Blake, the highly regarded forensic scientist. After Coleman was convicted, DNA analysis available at the time placed him in about 2 percent of the population that could have committed the crime. Dr. Blake says, if Virginia officials would let him test it again with today's technology, he could answer the question definitively. But Blake says, "every effort was made by the Virginia Attorney General to stop that process." Virginia officials want Blake to send the evidence back to Richmond. So does Tom Scott, the former prosecutor, who believes Coleman's advocates are using the evidence to push a political agenda. "If perchance the DNA test were to be conducted," Scott says, "and deflects attention away from Mr. Coleman, then they would certainly use that to beat the bandwagon to attempt to have capital punishment outlawed." That may be the one point on which the two sides are in full agreement. Washington, D.C. attorney Paul Enzinna, who represents Centurion Ministries and the newspapers pushing for the test, says advocates of Mr. Coleman and the press would "shout it from the rooftops" if the test proved Coleman was innocent. "The state keeps telling the citizens that we need the death penalty and that we're dong it right," says Enzinna. "The public has a right to know if the state is doing it right."

Enzinna fears that to avoid potential embarrassment, Virginia will destroy the evidence if it gets hold of it. Not true, says Attorney General Jerry Kilgore. But Kilgore argues that the doctrine of finality requires that at some point criminal cases must be concluded and closed for good. "We have to some day look to finality of judgment," Kilgore contends. "We feel certain in Virginia that Roger Coleman committed the crime and was punished appropriately." Such statements enrage Edward Blake, the forensic scientist, who argues that the constitution says nothing about a "doctrine of finality. Blake says he's not opposed to the death penalty, and believes the test could well confirm Coleman's guilt. But he says it's important to be sure. "The way I understand the democratic process," says Blake, "is the public has a right to know about the actions of the government."

The decision to test or not is now in the hands of the Virginia Supreme Court. As he stands in front of an open refrigerator that contains the small vial of evidence, Blake says he will not test it without the court's permission. But he also says that he will not send it back to Virginia, whatever the court decides. "Nobody can force me to send it back," Blake says defiantly. "At issue here is the public's right to know."

(UPDATE: DNA tests conducted in January 2006 confirmed the original guilty verdict in this case. Click here for more on this story.)



Home | Death Row Stories | Science of DNA | Law & Politics
Inside Out | Credits | WBUR