<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Archiving Issue, Part II</title>
	<atom:link href="//2011/05/the-archiving-issue-part-ii/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>//2011/05/the-archiving-issue-part-ii</link>
	<description>Transparency Through Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 09:08:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick McCabe</title>
		<link>//2011/05/the-archiving-issue-part-ii#comment-866</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick McCabe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 13:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opencourt.us/?p=898#comment-866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are these meeting open to the public?

I am interested in how some decisions are made, particularly the decision to turn off the camera for RO hearings.

It appears that this is a decision made by Justice Coven, who is known to have problems with restraining orders

I have been trying to contact you regarding this issue, but I have received little response.

As to the archives.  I expect that you are aware that you have enough tape on at least one justice to have them censured, so having the archives open will help openness and transparency in the court.

Some issues have been raised about muddying the jury pool and they may be legitimate, however they do not affect the majority of what you are streaming.  Restricting the archives appears to be a minor issue compared to having content out there that may lead to the censure of a justice.  

I am concerned that the court is restricting access in an attempt to hide their shortcomings.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are these meeting open to the public?</p>
<p>I am interested in how some decisions are made, particularly the decision to turn off the camera for RO hearings.</p>
<p>It appears that this is a decision made by Justice Coven, who is known to have problems with restraining orders</p>
<p>I have been trying to contact you regarding this issue, but I have received little response.</p>
<p>As to the archives.  I expect that you are aware that you have enough tape on at least one justice to have them censured, so having the archives open will help openness and transparency in the court.</p>
<p>Some issues have been raised about muddying the jury pool and they may be legitimate, however they do not affect the majority of what you are streaming.  Restricting the archives appears to be a minor issue compared to having content out there that may lead to the censure of a justice.  </p>
<p>I am concerned that the court is restricting access in an attempt to hide their shortcomings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
