Daily Archives: July 1, 2010

Patrick Permits Brunch Booze

Published July 1, 2010

Go ahead, have one on Sunday morning. (Kenn Wilson/Flickr)

Go ahead, have one on Sunday morning. (Kenn Wilson/Flickr)

After trying and failing to buy booze on Memorial Day, I blogged about the Bay State’s last remaining blue laws, one of which prevents you from buying alcohol before noon on Sunday (unless you’re buying Manischewitz, basically).

That law has become a little more relaxed, now that Gov. Deval Patrick signed the fiscal 2011 budget. Now restaurants will be able to serve liquor starting 10 a.m. on Sundays, a move meant to boost brunch business. That means I can enjoy a mimosa with my eggs benny while you sip a Bloody Mary.

By the way, best Bloody Mary’s in Boston are at The Beehive in the South End, where you can also enjoy live jazz while imbibing on Sunday morning.

Scott Brown, Populist Punching Bag

Published July 1, 2010

Sen. Scott Brown is a populist punching bag these days.

When I edited my student newspaper in college, one of my advisers told me to savor the hate mail. “It means people are reading!” he said.

Scott Brown, our junior senator of a few months, seems to be the biggest punching bag in politics these days.

He is the Senate’s pivotal 60th or 41st vote, depending how you slice it. (And with the death of Sen. Robert Byrd, the Senate is down one more Democrat.) And he seems to be the most popular politician in America. That’s untouchable prestige in Washington.

Columnist Gail Collins in the New York Times:

We have here a populist man of the people playing the role of friend to the big banks while not being particularly helpful to the long-term unemployed. What can I tell you? The guy is extremely popular in Massachusetts. Maybe it’s because he drives a truck.

Maybe he’ll trade in that pickup. Taxpayer advocacy groups, in partnership with Billionaires Against Regulating Finance (BARF), are presenting Brown with a new BMW today.

“Since Senator Brown is willing to gamble with American consumers, he’s sending the signal that he wants to trade in his iconic truck for something a little more luxurious, something more in line with the kinds of cars that his Wall Street cronies are driving,” the groups said in a statement about the stunt.

Globe columnist Yvonne Abraham complains that “Scott Brown can do no wrong.”

For example, repeatedly voting against an extension of unemployment benefits for laid-off workers, and for extra money to preserve services for the mentally disabled, makes him a hero because he’s holding down the deficit, saving the Average Guy taxes down the line.

Nobody seems to care that lots of folks, including some respected deficit hawks, think that’s a shortsighted, destructive stance in a recession.

And yet, she writes, “No matter what Brown does, he’s a populist hero.”

The Atlantic’s Brian Goldsmith calls Brown’s a “strange populism.” By successfully fighting the $19 billion tax on big banks, Goldsmith writes, the bill might end up raising fees for consumers and hitting a broader swathe of banks.

So Scott Brown the populist crusader, the protector of the middle class, the most popular politician in Massachusetts, has pushed a policy that probably means lower taxes for Wall Street, higher premiums for Main Street banks, and less lending to small businesses.

Everyone wants to pick on Scott Brown. Except the voters who put him there.

No Shame In Reaching Out

Published July 1, 2010

After publicly shaming suspected gang members — and causing a small outcry over constitutional rights — the city is trying a different tactic to reduce violence: reaching out.

The Globe’s Maria Cramer reports on a new program called Boston PACT, which sounds a lot like the Rev. Jeffrey Brown’s TenPoint Coalition or the Boston Foundation’s StreetSafe program but with broader government backing. (No word on how the program will be funded, though.)

The program would target the city’s 200 or 300 most violent offenders and try to help them, their families and their neighborhoods. Troubled families would get priority access to social services. A drug pusher’s little brother could get help enrolling for summer camp. A brave soul who tries to leave a gang could get help relocating for his protection.

It’s an ambitious, if not unique idea for Boston.

Now, will they take down those fliers?