Published November 18, 2010

Harvard says no. (Eric P/Flickr)

Harvard University has banned the infamous plastic noisemakers in advance of the 127th Harvard-Yale game. The Crimson reports:

Oak Yard Representative Spenser R. Goodman ’14 introduced the vote after talking to Harvard’s football players and members of the band about the possibility of vuvuzelas being played at The Game.

“If you’re on offense, you can’t hear your own team,” Goodman said. “And the band members prepare for this game for a long time.”

Vuvuzelas are louder than chainsaws.

Published November 17, 2010

Fall foliage (Bimal Nepal/Flickr)

Photographer Bimal Nepal submitted this electric-pink photograph to the WBUR Flickr group.

Enjoy the foliage while it lasts… winter feels close.

Published November 17, 2010

Three years ago, this was Filene's Basement. (Andrew Phelps/WBUR)

Consider it a final nail in the coffin for the long-stalled redevelopment of Filene’s Basement, which remains a gaping hole in Downtown Crossing.

The Boston Redevelopment Authority has formally revoked approval for Vornado Realty Trust, three years after the company won permission — and then failed — to redevelop the site.

The agency said the delay has cost the city of Boston $20 million in new tax revenue and more than 3,000 jobs.

Vornado has said the project was stalled because of the unforeseeable collapse of the economy.

Jessica Shumaker, a BRA spokeswoman, says the recession stalled a lot of construction projects — but this one was “special.”

“There are certainly other projects that have had their approval for longer, but they didn’t create a hole on the site,” Shumaker told me.

This is the first time in recent memory that the city has yanked permission for a construction project. Vornado’s construction permits are effectively worthless, since permits require BRA approval.

In September, the Globe reported Vornado had put up the site for sale after a two-year construction delay.

“Filene’s Basement was operating and employing people on this site, and that’s not the case anymore,” Shumaker said.

You can read the BRA’s letter to Vornado on Scribd.

Published November 17, 2010

“What is it that makes people happy?”

Just how happy are you? (Bruce Tuten/Flickr)

Harvard psychologist Matt Killingsworth and his colleagues are turning to the crowd for answers. An iPhone Web app, Track Your Happiness, asks people to stop what they’re doing and rate their current happiness on a scale of 1 to 100.

I have been participating for a few days now. Every day, at a random time (during waking hours), I get a text message with a link to answer a few questions about my current activity. I am encouraged to respond as quickly as possible, as long as it’s safe — i.e., not while driving. After filing enough reports, I can view my overall “happiness report.”

Taken in aggregate, some of the results are not surprising. People are happiest in the midst of sex — an activity that requires focus. The New York Times reports:

When asked to rate their feelings on a scale of 0 to 100, with 100 being “very good,” the people having sex gave an average rating of 90. That was a good 15 points higher than the next-best activity, exercising, which was followed closely by conversation, listening to music, taking a walk, eating, praying and meditating, cooking, shopping, taking care of one’s children and reading. Near the bottom of the list were personal grooming, commuting and working.

The hypothesis is that a focused mind is a happy mind. A mind that wanders is unhappy.

Of course, the researchers warn that correlation is not causation. “For instance, if you were often unhappy when you are at home, it might simply be because you don’t get home until late at night when you’re tired, and you could be less happy because you are tired, not because being at home is unpleasant in any way,” reads the disclaimer.

Are you using the app? Are the results surprising you?

• Also: Science Friday interviewed Killingsworth

Published November 17, 2010

There is surprisingly little debate in the blogosphere about Gov. Deval Patrick’s bold approach to immigration policy, which he detailed before a receptive crowd Tuesday at the Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition.

Gov. Deval Patrick (AP)

Patrick says he will seek in-state college tuition for undocumented immigrants who attended high school in Massachusetts. (Think of it as our version of the DREAM Act.) And Patrick favors drivers’ licenses for people who are here illegally.

“I know that embracing newcomers is out of fashion these days,” Patrick said at the coalition’s annual Thanksgiving luncheon in Boston. “The concern over illegal immigration has become so shrill that all immigrants get swept up in that emotion. I want you to know that you are welcome here in this commonwealth. This is your commonwealth. This is your home.”

The governor downplayed immigration during his re-election campaign, as some commenters have noted. His speech yesterday reignites a tense debate on Beacon Hill, as Kyle Cheney and Michael Norton report for the State House News Service. State Republicans oppose the plan.

Patrick said he supports all 131 recommendations from a year-old administration report. (Kudos to MassLive.com for finding the link. They also have video of the speech and a good write-up.)

What do you think?

• Do you support reduced college tuition — subsidized by taxpayers — for people who came here illegally but graduated high school?
• Do you think people who are here illegally, many of them behind the wheel already, should have drivers’ licenses?

Jump into the comments and respond (and please remain respectful).

Published November 16, 2010

Boats on Boston Harbor, Oct. 26, 2010 (xbasxx/Flickr)

Flickr photographer xbasxx submitted this beautiful snap to the WBUR Flickr group in late October.